Events

EUDAT Summer School: where data management meets the next generation of researchers

D7.2.1 Managing data curation and long-term preservation in a federated environment

The EUDAT “Data Curation and long term preservation in a federated environment” task has collected policy descriptions from a number of external pr

EUDAT data management summer school

D6.2: 1st Year Report on Status and Progress of Operations

The purpose of WP6 “Operations” is to make the Collaborative Data Infrastructure available for scientists and researchers by integrating and reliab

EUDAT CDI

6. Short introduction in iRODS rules and micro-services

This section provides a short introduction of the concepts of rules and micro-services.

D8.6: Report on Experiences Applying the Prototype with Different Community Use Cases

This deliverable investigates potential new technologies and develop prototypes and proof-of-concept (PoC) services based on community requirements

Demystifying PIDs and getting a handle on handles

New frontiers for EUDAT CDI in 2019: new collaborations, new members and shareholders

In this issue: - Delivering Research Data Management Solutions to suit your needs - SURFsara joins EUDAT Ltd as shareholder - Towards the European Open Science Cloud: 3 questions to Damien Lecarpentier, CSC & EUDAT CDI Secretariat - EUDAT CDI welcomes three new members from France (CERFACS), Portugal (FCCN), and Germany (GWDG) - Advancing the integration of B2 service data discovery and metadata management - Meet EUDAT at the upcoming EOSC-hub week, 10-12 April 2019, Prague

SNIC- Uppsala Universitet

JUELICH

Putting research communities in the driving seat of e-infrastructures

The European Commission has established various pan-European initiatives to develop e-infrastructures to support the work of European research communities. It has been a challenge for these initiatives to find effectiveways to engage with the communitiesin the process of developing the infrastructure services. Too often this engagement has been reduced to the existence of a forum where communities are supposed to give advice on the services being developed, which often has had little practical effect on the development of the actual services. On other occasions, e-infrastructures have been dominated by a limited number of stakeholders – which has sometimes lead to over-representation from a single community or institute. Consequently, although the services that were developed fitted the needs of that particular community or institute, it was subsequently hard to extend those services so as to be of benefit to other research communities with different requirements.